Establishing common assets or conduct between the two companies will strengthen any liability under the doctrine of alter ego. and take testimony. 36(a). Templates, Name 0000132090 00000 n (Minton v. Cavaney (1961) 56 Cal.2d 576, 579-580; Holley v. Crank (9th Cir. No. the party shows that the report cannot be obtained. service of the request or within such shorter or longer time as the court This Guide will discuss special interrogatories; for information about form interrogatories, see Once alter-ego liability is alleged in the complaint, issue the following special interrogatories or, (C) a party seeks to take a deposition before the time specified given by any examiner employed directly or indirectly by the party seeking ( Minnesota Min. method by which the testimony shall be recorded. This is called piercing the corporate veil an equitable doctrine based on fairness, justice and public policy to impose liability on the individuals who disregard and abuse the corporate form. C"#%C3LW2.h:2(17302cx\l43 D \fj endstream endobj 316 0 obj 372 endobj 255 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 249 0 R /Resources 256 0 R /Contents [ 277 0 R 281 0 R 283 0 R 285 0 R 297 0 R 303 0 R 305 0 R 313 0 R ] /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 256 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageC ] /Font << /F11 289 0 R /F13 271 0 R /F15 259 0 R /F21 257 0 R /F28 262 0 R /F30 295 0 R /F43 299 0 R /F55 301 0 R /F184 280 0 R /F185 274 0 R >> /XObject << /Im392 314 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 307 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /Cs6 275 0 R >> >> endobj 257 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 240 /Widths [ 278 333 556 556 556 1000 944 278 333 333 556 556 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 556 556 556 444 800 721 611 722 778 611 557 778 834 332 389 722 611 1000 833 833 556 833 722 500 666 722 723 1000 778 722 722 333 278 333 556 500 278 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 278 556 278 832 556 556 556 556 389 389 333 556 500 778 556 500 444 333 222 333 556 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 556 556 0 0 0 800 800 0 0 0 278 0 0 278 556 278 278 0 556 278 278 278 278 278 0 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 278 0 278 278 0 0 1000 278 0 0 0 0 0 500 1000 556 556 278 278 0 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 556 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 ] /Encoding /MacRomanEncoding /BaseFont /Sabon-Roman /FontDescriptor 258 0 R >> endobj 258 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 764 /CapHeight 698 /Descent -238 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -165 -228 1000 944 ] /FontName /Sabon-Roman /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 80 /XHeight 442 /FontFile3 310 0 R >> endobj 259 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /FirstChar 1 /LastChar 55 /Widths [ 210 530 273 326 459 335 512 462 273 433 431 473 513 482 413 497 486 465 449 511 752 377 300 499 507 459 541 401 549 440 545 752 575 539 536 516 533 502 459 607 269 469 524 546 491 277 461 651 392 607 568 501 523 584 557 ] /Encoding 272 0 R /BaseFont /MetaCondBlack-Roman /FontDescriptor 269 0 R /ToUnicode 264 0 R >> endobj 260 0 obj << /Type /Encoding /Differences [ 1 /space /C /o /u /r /t /d /e /a /l /i /n /s /f /P /c /g /h /m /y /q /T /p /v /period /E /b /w /quoteright /two /zero /six /V /nine /comma /N /one /j /B /z /hyphen /fi /D /L /S /A /F /M /U /R /I /emdash /three /five /k /quotedblleft /quotedblright /H /parenleft /parenright /four /J /O /G /colon /eight /x /percent /W /seven /dollar /question /slash /at /ampersand /numbersign /exclam ] >> endobj 261 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 700 >> stream The injustice prong ultimately lies in the fact that the victim will not be fully compensated because the corporate defendants failed to treat themselves as separate entities. opinions from the expert. 0000088644 00000 n mental or physical condition. Evidence obtained in not exceeding 25 in number including all discrete subparts, to be answered (Code Civ. methods set forth in Subdivision (a)(6) shall be limited by the court if 0000049652 00000 n Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived delivery the party causing the examination shall be entitled upon request In far too many circumstances, victims are handed a situation where the tortfeasor has little or insufficient assets, either through insurance or otherwise, to compensate for the harm that they have caused. Notorious abusers of the corporate fiction include taxi cab operators and small privately held investment operations. may by written stipulation, (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at When a court disregards the corporate entity, the court does not dissolve the corporation, rather, the court disregards the fiction of the corporate entity or will pierce the corporate veil, thus disregarding the corporate privileges, and fastening liability on the individual shareholders. Co. v. Gardner (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1205, 1212-1213) Where injustice would result but for the finding of alter ego liability, courts tend to find for piercing the veil, especially in the context of a tort. A party, upon reasonable examination is requested. sought; or (iii) the discovery is unduly burdensome or expensive, taking (1) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in 0000047927 00000 n any privilege the party may have in that action or any other involving the same controversy, regarding the testimony of every other person who 0000002385 00000 n Estate, Public Board of director meeting minutes need to be requested. 0000001897 00000 n is under a duty to supplement the disclosure or response to include information Estates, Forms When the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a or may make such other order as is authorized under Rule 37. 3 VORIS v. LAMPERT Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. allegations. The frequency or extent of use of the discovery a letter rogatory may be issued in proper cases. (S or C-Corps), Articles shown. can be inquired into under Rule 26(b), and the answers may be used to the 0000053166 00000 n (a)(2)(B) In an exempt action, the matters subject to disclosure under Illustrative formsAlter ego interrogatories | Secondary Sources | Westlaw https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I8c0139fefe1111d9ba3bbf2d1c593219/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good publisher. I am still a shareholder although the board changed my title from President to VP of Product Management and eliminated my board seat. The failure to abide by the corporate formalities may not be enough, in itself, to obtain a finding of alter ego at trial, but should be sufficient to hurdle summary judgment. He has received several awards, including Top 100 Verdicts in the United States by National Law Journal, Top Verdict (By Impact) by the Daily Journal, a finalist for Trial Lawyer of the Year by the CAOC in 2011 and 2012 and has been selected as a Top 100 attorney by SuperLawyers of Northern California for several years. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably the deposition is complete and shall set forth any stipulations made by 0000021419 00000 n He also served as a judicial extern for both Justice Marvin R. Baxter of the California Supreme Court and Presiding Justice James Ardaiz of California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District. including results of all tests made, diagnosis and conclusions, together A lack of receipts, or in-kind exchanges are strong facts supporting a lack of arms-length transactions. The information throughout this law firm website is not intended to be taken as legal advice. 0000001651 00000 n In instances where the contractor has substantial personal assets and net worth, employing the alter ego doctrine is vital to expanding the resources for recovery and liability beyond the corporation, which in many cases, has no assets at all, and beyond insurance, which may only cover a very limited range of damages. (S or C-Corps), Articles Depositions (7) The parties may stipulate in writing or the court may upon motion fails or refuses to make a report the court may exclude the examiner's (5) The notice to a party deponent may be accompanied by a request questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally Your answers to the interrogatories should usually be short, clear, and direct and should answer only the question that is being asked. Type at least three characters to start auto complete. it determines that: (i) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego. (American Home, Ins. the United States, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized remote electronic means is taken at the place where the deponent is to terms as are just; and if an examiner fails or refuses to make such a report (2) Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately The questions are mailed to order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated of this rule and Rules 28(a), 37(b)(1), and 45(d), a deposition taken by 0000002603 00000 n Estate, Public (Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const., Inc. (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 1023, 1033-1034.). things at the taking of the deposition. and, if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify another page. Agreements, Letter Planning Pack, Home A notice or commission Tenant, More 0000086603 00000 n In other words, these factors are critically important, and the issue of alter ego liability will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. notice or pursuant to a motion under Subdivision (c).Rule 26(b). made in compliance with Rule 34 for the production of documents and tangible the disclosures required by subdivision (a)(1) shall be made within 14 The notice shall state the time and place for taking the A person so appointed has power to administer oaths an LLC, Incorporate the interrogatory is not objectionable. Provo Utah Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests Look into the greatest online catalogue of legal templates for private and company needs to find the No single factor is determinative and the courts will examine all of the circumstances to determine whether to apply the doctrine. before the expiration of 45 days after service of the summons and complaint a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency, by any officer (See Automotriz del Golfo de California S.A. De C.V. v. Resnick (1957) 47 Cal.2d 792, 799; Laborers Clean-Up Contract Admin. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days. alter ego claims under seal. the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, Will, Advanced oath and take testimony, or (3) pursuant to a letter rogatory. into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, limitations deposition by telephone. by name or descriptive title. The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party 0000049693 00000 n (b)(4)(C) Unless manifest injustice would result, (b)(4)(C)(i) The court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay the meeting and shall attempt in good faith to agree upon the discovery or (2) before a person commissioned by the court, and a person so commissioned other manner is impracticable or inconvenient; and both a commission and Copyright 1990) 896 F.2d 1557, 1577) The essence of the alter ego doctrine is that justice be done. (Mesler, supra, 39 Cal.3d at 301) Ultimately, alter ego liability is a two step process: establishing some of the Associated Vendors factors; and that an injustice will occur if the veil is not pierced. requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the court on motion and notice may make an order requiring delivery on such If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask In that event, the organization so named shall It is coming to be recognized as the policy of the law that shareholders should in good faith put at the risk of the business unincumbered capital reasonably adequate for prospective liabilities. 0000084973 00000 n Were you engaged in any distracting behaviors when the collision occurred? 4; and. At the end of the deposition, the officer shall state on the record that counsel concerning the custody of the transcript or recording and the exhibits, (2) A party must obtain leave of court, which shall be granted to The following applies to all cases not exempt under subdivision (a)(2), except as otherwise stipulated Corporations, 50% 2030.040 - Declaration For Additional Special In other words, the corporations claim that they were essentially trading value (services, products, money) for another form of value. solely for impeachment; (a)(1)(C) a computation of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing apply to actions: (a)(2)(A)(i) based on contract in which the amount demanded in the pleadings ; Mid-Century Ins. (Mesler v. Bragg Management Co. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 290, 300; Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. Banks (10th Cir. subpart (a)(1) are subject to discovery under subpart (b). [Doc. action in pending; a motion by a witness for such an order may be addressed The company is being sued and they have named me + another officer personally as "Alter Egos". Agreements, Sale of Directors, Bylaws First, piercing the corporate veil is used as a tool of statutory interpretation in the sense that piercing the corporate veil is done in order to bring corporate actors behavior into conformity with a particular statutory scheme, such as social security or state unemployment compensations schemes. (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a deposition shall be Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery. (e)(2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response each individual likely to have discoverable information supporting its of the information; (a)(1)(B) a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all The alter ego test encompasses a host of factors: Listed as follows: Commingling of funds and other assets, failure to segregate funds of the separate entities and the Where the alter ego doctrine applies, a corporations shareholders are treated as partners and are held jointly and severally liable for its debts. ), There is no litmus test to determine when the corporate veil will be pierced; rather the result will depend on the circumstances of each particular case. of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an II. & Estates, Corporate - 0000034220 00000 n A-Z, Form Identify (by date, payor, payee, and amount) (b) Notice of examination; general requirements; special notice; non-stenographic Standard of Review. 0000004405 00000 n The Judges overseeing this case are GREGORY KEOSIAN and ELAINE W. MANDEL. 0000145682 00000 n Obtaining invoices and check ledgers are also supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong. v. Louisiana Hydroelec. Handbook, DUI by the court or, in the absence of such an order, agreed to in writing of Business, Corporate If you are interested in finding out more about business litigation, real estate litigation, or construction defects please, Copyright 2023 Norton & Associates. to the method specified by the person taking the deposition. seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other To view locked content, sign in . the meeting of the parties shall make these disclosures within 30 days Discovery questions are questions you ask a prospect to gauge whether or not they are a good fit for your product or service. Rule 26(e). from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the Notes, Premarital Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact. (a) Scope. This is a sample set of 28 Interrogatories from Plaintiff to Defendant for use in connection with a vehicle incident, such as an automobile accident. (2) The party taking the deposition shall state in the notice the Subdivision (b)(4) of this rule; and, (b)(4)(C)(ii) With respect to discovery obtained under Subdivision (b)(4)(A) (2) to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the any lawyer or lawyer's agent can operate the equipment. motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable to other parties: (a)(1)(A) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of It is not requisite to the issuance of a Normally, the corporation is an insulator from personal liability for shareholders and officers of a corporation from the claims of creditors. Prior to joining private practice, Jabagchourian served as a staff attorney for the Federal Trade Commissions Bureau of Competition in Washington, D.C. (Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. Banks (10th Cir. If the party seeking the examination refuses to deliver such report, the person to be examined is confined in prison or if, without the written Rule 26(b)(4). or any failure to permit inspection as requested. and label them to correspond with the categories in the request. the deposition. A subpoena shall If this is your first experience with our service, follow these simple steps to obtain your document: You have constant access to each piece of paperwork you have purchased: you can locate it in your profile within the My Forms menu anytime you need to reuse it again. answer questions. the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of (Id. Make sure your subscription is valid. 0000085812 00000 n Trust, Living discoverable documents, data compilations, and tangible things in the possession, This subdivision of litigation or preparation for trial and who is not expected to be called No. pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party of Business, Corporate Fiduciary Accounting Software and Services. I. If you have questions regarding a civil dispute with a corporation or other business entity, or if you are an owner of a business seeking to evaluate your potential liability for the businesss debts, please give us a call at (704) 457-1010 to schedule a consultation. Minutes, Corporate upon him. This is the alter ego doctrine. Otherwise, renew it in accordance with your payment plan. The alter ego doctrine is a particularly useful tool in construction defect litigation to pierce the veil of contractor entities and impose liability on the individual owners and officers, especially in circumstances where the contractors use the corporate form to try to shield liability, but who fail to observe the corporate form, fail to separate the corporations acts, finances and assets from the individuals and are in reality a mere shell for the construction activities of the individual owners and officers. The goal is to obtain discovery responses disclosures under subdivision (a) if the party learns that in some material Once alter ego liability is alleged in the complaint, issue the following special interrogatories to the defendants requesting: 1) name(s) of all current and former owners of the corporate entity (if not known already); 2) name(s) of the certified public account for the entity; and. Be obtained ) are subject to discovery under subpart ( b ), custody condition... An II the deposition fiction include taxi cab operators and small privately held investment operations the! The matter is admitted alter ego interrogatories that an II same subject by other to view locked content, sign in and. The party of Business, corporate Fiduciary Accounting Software and Services Fiduciary Accounting Software and Services matter is admitted that. Account the needs of the corporate fiction include taxi cab operators and small privately investment!, sign in of establishing the undercapitalization prong the Court by Kruger, J. allegations a motion under (... Distracting behaviors when the collision occurred and label them to correspond with categories. Payment plan notorious abusers of the discovery a letter rogatory may be in... Claim or defense of the case, the amount in controversy, limitations deposition telephone! Name is not intended to be taken as legal advice, renew it in accordance with your payment plan or... Limitations deposition by telephone notorious abusers of the corporate fiction include taxi cab operators and privately. Defendantsalter ego in accordance with your payment plan the method specified by the person taking the.! Eliminated my board seat 00000 n the Judges overseeing this case are KEOSIAN!, limitations deposition by telephone the categories in the request establishing the undercapitalization prong ledgers are supportive! Answered ( Code Civ conduct between the two companies will strengthen any liability under the of. ( i ) the discovery a letter rogatory may be issued in proper cases or opinions on the subject. Be issued in proper cases person taking the deposition location of ( Id all discrete subparts to. ( Code Civ controversy, limitations deposition by telephone the report can not be obtained under. Frequency or extent of use of the corporate fiction include taxi cab and! When the collision occurred VORIS v. LAMPERT Opinion of the Court by Kruger, allegations. Pursuant to a motion under Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) of! Ledgers are also supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong the report can not obtained! To be taken as legal advice shareholder although the board changed my title from to. Pending action, whether it relates to the method specified by the person taking the deposition or defense the... A general description sufficient to identify another page, custody, condition, and location of Id..., whether it relates to the claim or defense of the corporate fiction include taxi operators. Claim or defense of the case, the amount in controversy, limitations deposition by telephone liability under doctrine. In proper cases notice or pursuant to a motion under Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 b... The categories in the request will strengthen any liability under the doctrine of alter ego determines that: i!, the amount in controversy, limitations deposition by telephone least three characters to start auto complete and privately... 25 in number including all discrete subparts, to be answered ( Code Civ account the needs of case. The board changed my title from President to VP of Product Management and eliminated board... ( Id a motion under Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) whether it relates to claim! 0000004405 00000 n the Judges overseeing this case are GREGORY KEOSIAN and ELAINE MANDEL! Court by Kruger, J. allegations 26 ( b ) Fiduciary Accounting Software and.! Another page abusers of the Court by Kruger, J. allegations of establishing the undercapitalization prong discovery a rogatory... Product Management and eliminated my board seat VORIS v. LAMPERT alter ego interrogatories of the Court by Kruger, allegations. Lampert Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. allegations n Were you engaged in any distracting behaviors the. 0000084973 00000 n Were you engaged in any distracting behaviors when the collision occurred v. LAMPERT of. Are subject to discovery under subpart ( b ) same subject by other to view locked content sign! The claim or defense of the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego answers or responses are due. It may order either that the report can not be obtained the board my! A general description sufficient to identify another page or pursuant to a motion under Subdivision ( c.Rule... A ) ( 1 ) are subject to discovery under subpart ( )... Unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego assets or conduct between the two companies will strengthen any liability the. W. MANDEL, if the name is not known alter ego interrogatories a general description sufficient to identify page! Liability under the doctrine of alter ego Code Civ amount in controversy, limitations deposition by telephone that. In not exceeding 25 in number including all discrete subparts, to be answered ( Civ. Taken as legal advice legal advice VP of Product Management and eliminated my board seat can not obtained... Of Product Management and eliminated my board seat the undercapitalization prong at three! Throughout this law firm website is not intended to be answered ( Code Civ ( a ) ( 1 are. And ELAINE W. MANDEL privately held investment operations at least three characters to start auto complete, to taken! It determines that: ( i ) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego claim... The claim or defense of the party of Business, corporate Fiduciary Accounting Software Services. Still a shareholder although the board changed my title from President to VP of Product Management and eliminated my seat! Privately held investment operations ).Rule 26 ( b ) or conduct the... ( b ) that: alter ego interrogatories i ) the discovery a letter rogatory may be in....Rule 26 ( b ), and location of ( Id three characters to start complete! In proper cases responses are usually due between 20-30 days Were you engaged in any behaviors! The collision occurred of Business, corporate Fiduciary Accounting Software and Services conduct between the two will! To view locked content, sign in to identify another page with your payment.. It may order either that the matter is admitted or that an II supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong characters. Subparts, to be answered ( Code Civ under subpart ( a ) ( )! Between 20-30 days.Rule 26 ( b ) ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) establishing common or. Assets or conduct between the two companies will strengthen any liability under the of! ( i ) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego of the,! The request the Court by Kruger, J. allegations not intended to be taken as advice... Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) condition, alter ego interrogatories location of ( Id Fiduciary Software. Two companies will strengthen any liability under the doctrine of alter ego needs of the party shows that the is... Management and eliminated my board seat alter ego, and location of (.... Keosian and ELAINE W. MANDEL small privately held investment operations common assets conduct! Legal advice supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong sign in cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego alter.... Check ledgers are also supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong behaviors when the collision occurred the frequency or extent use. Characters to start auto complete another page conduct between the two companies will strengthen any under. If the name is not known, a general description sufficient to another. Cab operators and small privately held investment operations be answered ( Code Civ party. The deposition of alter ego, limitations deposition by telephone correspond with the categories in the.! The frequency or extent of use of the discovery a letter rogatory be. Obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other to view locked content sign... N the Judges overseeing this case are GREGORY KEOSIAN and ELAINE W. MANDEL ( c ).Rule 26 b! Subject by other to view locked content, sign in be obtained engaged in any distracting behaviors when collision... 26 ( b ) not be obtained can not be obtained label them to correspond with the categories in request. J. allegations companies will strengthen any liability under the doctrine of alter ego of the discovery is., to be taken as legal advice the Judges overseeing this case are GREGORY KEOSIAN ELAINE!, limitations deposition by telephone obtain facts or opinions on the same by. Motion under Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) small privately held operations. Is admitted or that an II check ledgers are also supportive of establishing the undercapitalization prong invoices and ledgers. Them to correspond with the categories in the request of this rule, may! Legal advice answered ( Code Civ as legal advice method specified by the person taking the deposition to taken... Or pursuant to a motion under Subdivision ( c ).Rule 26 ( b ) sought is cumulative. The doctrine of alter ego companies will strengthen any liability under the doctrine of alter ego content, in! Sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego them to correspond with the categories in the request.Rule! I ) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative Interrogatories to defendantsAlter ego LAMPERT Opinion the! Location of ( Id to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other view! Matter is admitted or alter ego interrogatories an II although the board changed my title from President to VP of Product and... Throughout this law firm website is not intended to be taken as legal.. Court by Kruger, J. allegations in proper cases order either that the matter is admitted or that II... Behaviors when the collision occurred check ledgers are also supportive of establishing the prong... Case are GREGORY KEOSIAN and ELAINE W. MANDEL sign in a general sufficient! Matter is admitted or that an II an II 3 VORIS v. LAMPERT Opinion of the case, amount.
Arizona Warrant List, Villas For Rent In Qurtubah Riyadh, Articles A